To Subscribe

We invite you to join the dialog. In order to submit articles receive and to register for updates, please email your request to
hcole@hcole-environmental.com

This blog is a product of Henry S. Cole and Associates, Inc. All rights reserved (c).

Henry S. Cole and Associates, Inc.

Dr. Cole is an environmental scientist with extensive experience regarding toxic chemicals in the environment. Henry S. Cole & Associates provides scientific support for communities, environmental organizations and government agencies. Dr. Cole is also a writer on the relationship between environment and economics.

Thursday, January 14, 2010

Learning from Nature's Economic Success


Why do the problems we face, from economic meltdowns to ecological destruction seem so intractable? Why do so many of measures taken to solve problems seem to be ineffective or even counterproductive? What might work better? Let’s look through a different lens; Ecosystems, from forests to prairies to coral reefs, are not simply beautiful, they are first and foremost economic systems – systems that represent the most successful, enduring economies on earth.

A pound of forest soil contains thousands of bacterial species but also fungi, worms, beetles – gainfully employed, competitive, yet mutually contributing to the forest’s overall health. Ecosystems have no credit card debt, no inflation, and no federal deficits. Nothing is too big to fail and there are no government bailouts. Despite numerous cataclysms – ice ages and asteroid collisions life has evolved, adapted and thrived for 3.8 billion years.

Yet, rather than learning from nature we are assailing it with ferocity; the dominant economies are depleting fisheries, destroying forests, creating dead zones in coastal waters and uprooting traditional societies whose economies are closely aligned with nature. We are changing climate in ways that will create future displacements and economic havoc.

The presentation examines the elements of resilience and health in ecosystems and contrasts them with increasing systemic vulnerability found in the dominant human economies.

What we need is a restructuring of human economies in ways that capitalize on: (a) the resilient and resource efficient organizational arrangements found in nature and (b) mutually beneficial partnerships with natural systems.

The presentation draws on several positive examples – some by MOFFA entrepreneurs. So large a transformation from today’s economics to the economics of resilient health cannot happen overnight; however it is essential that we point our compasses for the right direction.



3 comments:

  1. Interesting and valuable ideas! Made me think of the following points:
    * Waste is an important aspect of our economies that we should address. Nature knows no waste. Perhaps our economies too should charge for disposal of stuff and incorporate this cost into the price of products we buy. It seems to me that alone, if can be done, will change a lot of things.
    * Does that mean we are making an argument against social systems, when we say our economies should be like nature? Will it be survival of the fittest? Nature can be brutal, it has no values (or as we think of them), how should we incorporate values, which all humans have, into our ecnomies? What should we and what shouldn't we learn from nature?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for your comments, Anonymous. I agree with your first point. I intend to address the second point at length in a forthcoming book on this subject. We must strengthen social systems so that they are far more resilient. Remember that brutality in ecosystems (e.g. a hawk swooping down and devouring a baby bird or a pack of wolves felling a straggling caribou) may seem brutal, but compared to the brutality of human warfare, nature seems rather benign.

    Right now we have an economic system which increasingly resembles "survival of the richest." It is a brutal system that marginalizes growing numbers of poor. Look at the flow of capital -- you have a loan with a big bank, they charge you 18 percent, you put your savings in the same bank, if you're lucky you get 2 percent. Nature by in large is a thriving complex and resilient system involving a great deal of competition and cooperation; there are no give aways to the most powerful. The hawks and wolves work their tails off and of the whole food web have the smallest amount of biomass.

    Now on to the philosophical question which includes two dimensions. First, moral...Many or most cultures believe in protecting the most vulnerable people. That's not the same as protecting vulnerable businesses. We should have a social safety net; its an important part of the infrastructure. If the safety net is missing the society winds up paying -- i.e. investing in prisons rather than education, investing in expensive cleanup operations instead of clean technology, etc.

    I thank you again for your critically important questions and invite further dialog.
    Hank Cole

    ReplyDelete
  3. P.S. there are many social systems in nature; pods of dolphins and whales, a bee hive, an ant colony, canine packs, primate groups, herds of caribou. All of these systems feature a great deal of cooperation as well as competition between members. Somebodies got to be alpha dog.

    ReplyDelete