To Subscribe

We invite you to join the dialog. In order to submit articles receive and to register for updates, please email your request to
hcole@hcole-environmental.com

This blog is a product of Henry S. Cole and Associates, Inc. All rights reserved (c).

Henry S. Cole and Associates, Inc.

Dr. Cole is an environmental scientist with extensive experience regarding toxic chemicals in the environment. Henry S. Cole & Associates provides scientific support for communities, environmental organizations and government agencies. Dr. Cole is also a writer on the relationship between environment and economics.

Monday, May 17, 2010

A must see: Online CBS 60 Minutes: The BP Oil Blowout

60 Minute Expose (click)
Some of the best investigative journalism ever.  Mike Williams, the rig's chief electrical engineer survived under the most harrowing circumstances imaginable. He now tells What BP, Halliburton, and Transocean Executives never told the Senators this past Tuesday -- How BP (weeks behind schedule) in a rush to get the oil ignored critical advice to use safer procedures. For BP, Profits trumped safety, 11 workers lost their lives and what may become one of the worst ecological nightmares in history continuesWe also learn that there is another BP time bomb in the Gulf -- the Atlantis Rig. Hopefully Mr. Williams will get to tell his story in Congress. 


                Oil slick BP Deepwater Horizon Wellhead: May 6 (Daniel Beltra, Reuters)

Sunday, May 16, 2010

Too Deep to Fail = Too Deep to Drill

Listening to the Senators grill BP's Lamar McKay (BP photo, left) and executives from Halliburton and Transocean last week, one thing became very clear --  no one really knows what is going on a mile below the surface. The gush rate may be 5000 or 100,000 barrels a day. According to an article in today's NY Times  scientists have discovered enormous plumes deep in Gulf waters as big as 10 miles long, 3 miles wide and as thick as 300 feet thick -- indicating that the release rate may be much greater than BP's 5000 barrel per day estimate. Scientists fear that the submerged oil is likely to deplete dissolved oxygen critical to the survival of marine life. 


And, as BP's repeated failed efforts demonstrate, its very difficult to figure out how to shut off the flow at this depth. As those on the hot seat testified they have virtually no experience with such disasters. According to a number of Internet sources there are very few wells pumping from depths greater than 5,000 feet. 

Photo Source: Oilism


There are very few oil wells that pump oil from these depths. According to Shell's website, the company's Perdido Development (pictured below and pumping for a month) is the deepest installation in the world with a depth of 8000 feet below the Gulf surface some 200 miles from the Texas coast.  Perdido is pumping natural gas as well as crude through separate pipe lines to the shore. Like the BP's operation, remotely controlled robots (designed to withstand the enormous pressures) will patrol the well head area on the sea bed. We can only wonder what would happen if disaster strikes Shell's new installation. (Perdido means lost in Spanish.) Shell plans to use the same floating rig to pump oil from other deep water locations (link above). 


Photo Source: Shell Oil 
                             
It is clear that much tougher regulations and enforcement are in store for offshore oil ventures. However, given the magnitude and duration of ecological destruction and costs to fishing, tourism and residents along the coast additional constraints will be needed. 


According to Shell's website  the Perdido is a floating rig that can be transported to oil rich Gulf sources hundreds of miles from the current location. However, it would make sense to restrict Perdido's production until a complete investigation of the BP disaster and the Perdido installation (accident prevention, accident response and control measures and environmental impact assessments are completed. 


In addition, there should be a complete moratorium on any new drilling in  U.S. coastal waters until the federal government can assure that we won't have any repeats of the BP disaster.  


                                                         

Thursday, May 13, 2010

Wednesday, May 12, 2010

A report from Louisiana by Willie Fontenot: Big Oil Versus Democratic Rights and the Environment

Editor's Note: Willie Fontenot, an environmental leader from Baton Rouge sent in the following alert along with some encouraging thoughts. His photo appears below and bio following the article. 




While hundreds of thousands of barrels of oil from the BP's gusher into the Gulf, oil companies have been waging a nasty campaign to pass legislation that would close the Tulane Environmental Law Clinic and similar clinics around the state. The Bill is being pushed by the oil and chemical industry. There is an excellent article in today's The Times-Picayune by reporter James Gill: Here is the intro: "Although the bill was conceived as revenge against Tulane, its animus extends to every university law clinic in the state. Students at the clinics provide free legal services to the poor across the legal spectrum. Yet because Tulane has provoked the ire of polluting industries, all the other clinics would be forced to close, or operate under severe constraints. The bill would put the kibosh on four of Tulane's clinics, according to Law School dean Stephen Griffin.


It would forbid clinics to 'file a petition, motion or suit' against any government agency or to seek monetary damages for any client. Clinics, except in criminal cases, would not be allowed to raise "state constitutional challenges in state or federal court."


Willie Continues:Two months ago I would have given the bill a 90 percent chance of passing. Today the chances are probably below 10 percent. Just the number of people who responded to the article this morning is a pretty good example of how the public is taking a new look at everything that government does and does not do. The BP disaster has definitely changed many things. This morning on CNN they were doing a story which compared the EXXON Valdez disaster in Alaska 21 years ago and how the waters and wetlands of Alaska have not yet recovered from that oil spill. We now have something which is giving the news media an unusual opportunity they have not had in twenty years.


________


Willie Fontenot has been involved in environmental and social justice issues for forty years. He served in the Environmental Section of the Louisiana Attorney General’s office for twenty seven years. Over the last 40 years he has helped to organize more than 500 community groups throughout Louisiana and more than 30 other states on a wide variety of environmental and social justice issues and problems.

Friday, May 7, 2010

Gold at Record High Prices -- Cost to Ecosystems Skyrockets

What does the high price of gold have to do with the fate of the Amazon Rain Forest?

Although our attention is focused on the disastrous BP Oil gusher in the Gulf, there is another eco-menace at work – it’s the price of gold. As the article in the side page (link) highlights, jittery investors in global stock markets are buying gold, the universal safe bet, driving the price of gold up to a near record high. The soaring price paid for gold is fueling a modern day gold rush -- much of it in ecologically sensitive areas. 

Unfortunately, some of the best deposits are in ecologically critical rain forests. To make matters worse, gold mining is one of the most environmentally destructive processes ever invented.

“Gold mining, however, generates more waste per ounce than any other metal, and the mines' mind-bending disparities of scale show why: These gashes in the Earth are so massive they can be seen from space, yet the particles being mined in them are so microscopic that, in many cases, more than 200 could fit on the head of a pin. ….Extracting a single ounce of gold there—the amount in a typical wedding ring—requires the removal of more than 250 tons of rock and ore.” Source: Stock Block Web











In the Peruvian forest pictured above, mining is done using hydraulic mining of and uses toxic chemicals including cyanide and mercury to separate the gold from the deposits of mud and sand (found in river channels and flood plains). Mercury escaping from the process can form an organic form that biomagnifies in food chains. For an excellent article on the subject see: Mongabay Website 

As the figure from Mongabay shows, gold mining can have a devastating impact on forests. This impact has been escalating dramatically over the past few years.

The figure in the sidebar (click title) demonstrates the strong inverse relationship between the value of gold and the value of stock markets. 

Here is a question: How can the free market alone protect rain forests and other ecosystems from this kind of devastation. Post your thoughts?